Name it the liberal media “one phrase” sport. All it takes is one phrase – one phrase ever so subtly and punctiliously positioned in a information story. And with that the liberal media units the liberal narrative concerning the matter of the second.
Take what is named the Hyde Modification. For many who got here in late, the regulation was sponsored years in the past by the late Illinois Congressman Henry Hyde. Mr. Hyde, a Republican, was a staunch opponent of abortion. So he launched an modification that forbids the federal funding of abortion, with exceptions allowed to avoid wasting the lifetime of a lady and if she was raped or pregnant because of incest. The modification handed the Home overwhelmingly in 1976 (312–93) and has been tinkered with occasionally however is actually very a lot nonetheless on the books.
Thus right here we’re, a full 45 years later, and with West Virginia Democratic Senator Joe Manchin saying that he is not going to vote for the Democrats’ reconciliation invoice until it contains the Hyde Modification.
Right here’s the liberal media phrase sport at work, this time over in The Hill. The headline: “Manchin says reconciliation invoice should embody controversial Hyde Modification”
Be aware the phrase sport at play: The Hyde Modification, 4 and a half many years on the books, handed overwhelmingly, is abruptly labeled “controversial.” All method of conservative critics known as out the sport.
Doug Heye, a GOP strategist requested:
Controversial to whom? The vast majority of the general public helps it. That after included Joe Biden.
Over there at Nationwide Overview, NR’s David Harsanyi chimed in:
The Hyde Modification is “controversial?” Biden was a supporter of it for 40 years. Modified his thoughts throughout the marketing campaign.
John McCormack, additionally at NR, tweeted: “A January 2021 Marist ballot discovered People again the Hyde modification 58% to 38%.”
Practically similar to outcomes of Politico/Harvard ballot from 2016.
Author Kimberly Ross, who has been printed in The Washington Examiner and USA At the moment amongst different locations, famous:
Props to Senator Manchin for insisting that the Hyde Modification be included in reconciliation laws. Regardless of loud claims on the contrary, Hyde isn’t excessive in any respect. It simply retains federal funds from going to pay for abortions. It ought to at all times be protected.
All of those individuals and probably extra are on to the “one phrase sport.” As talked about, the target is at all times to set the liberal narrative concerning the matter of the second, on this case that the Hyde Modification is “controversial.”
There was one other one-word sport” instance this week, this one in The New York Instances. The story was concerning the issuing of subpoenas by the Home January sixth Committee. The targets of the subpoenas have been the planners of the Trump rally on the White Home, this rally previous the later one on the Capitol that resulted in a riot.
This time the one-word sport was performed with an outline of the group gathered on the White Home ellipse to listen to then-President Trump. The group is described by The Instances because the “agitated viewers.”
As somebody who was at that rally – however not on the Capitol later – and with a entrance row seat I can say with first hand data the viewers was something however agitated. On the contrary, rock and roll music was blaring from the sound system earlier than Trump’s arrival and the individuals round me have been actually dancing as in the event that they have been at a rock live performance. I spoke with lots of people – and never a one might remotely be described as “agitated.”
But The Instances, ever so cautious of the liberal media narrative of the later Capitol riot, rigorously included the phrase “agitated”, as if to set the stage for what would occur later within the day.
Then there’s Politico. The opposite day Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic Senate Majority Chief, gave a speech wherein he stated this, with daring print for emphasis equipped:
After I first was an assemblyman, they wished to construct a congregate residing place for retarded youngsters—the entire neighborhood was towards it. These are innocent youngsters! They only wanted some assist. We acquired it finished.
In right this moment’s world, the “R-word” is taken into account by many because the equal of the “N-word” when utilized to the disabled or developmentally challenged – and people who use the “R-word” can rely on being known as out.
However right here was the shrugging headline on Schumer that Politico ran: “Schumer apologizes after utilizing outdated time period for disabled youngsters throughout housing interview.”
It additionally tweeted this: “Senate Majority Chief Chuck Schumer used an outmoded phrase to discuss with developmentally disabled youngsters throughout a latest podcast look.”
The one-word sport getting used to guard Schumer was rapidly acknowledged by The Each day Wire’s Ben Shapiro, who tweeted: “Attention-grabbing the way it’s simply ‘outmoded’ when a Democrat says it”
Grabien founder Tom Elliott humorously tweeted his remark Jeopardy-style: “I’ll take ‘This would not be the headline if it have been Trump for $500, Alex.’”
Which is to say had Trump or any outstanding Republican stated precisely what Schumer stated, it might be a left-wing media trigger célèbre, a firestorm of rage But it surely wasn’t Trump or any Republican who stated it, it was Schumer the Democrat Senate Chief. So Politico shrugs with the one-word sport used to guard Schumer. He simply used an “outmoded” or “outdated” phrase. Nothing to see right here people, run alongside.
As famous, that is an ever so refined sport at play. However increasingly conservatives have realized how the sport is performed.
The target is so simple as it’s crystal clear: Set the liberal narrative on the subject of the second through the use of a single descriptive phrase – normally a phrase with unfavourable connotations.
And if mandatory? Downplay with one phrase to guard the errant Democrat of the second.
Are you able to say “understood”?