This text is a part of HuffPost’s biweekly politics publication. Click on right here to subscribe.
Senate Minority Chief Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has been doing fairly the rhetorical dance on abortion.
Final week, following the leak of a draft Supreme Courtroom opinion that might overturn Roe v. Wade, McConnell stated that it was “attainable” Republicans would search to enact a nationwide ban on abortion.
That hardly got here as a shock, on condition that prohibiting abortion has been a prime GOP precedence for many years and that a lot of outstanding Republicans have already stated they suppose a nationwide prohibition must be on the desk.
However on Tuesday, McConnell “clarified” his feedback. He advised reporters that he was merely talking about what was technically attainable ― and, by implication, not about what he really envisioned Republicans trying in the event that they gained management of Congress and the presidency.
That, too, was unsurprising. Banning abortion could be extraordinarily unpopular ― polling constantly reveals that almost all Individuals suppose it must be authorized in not less than some circumstances ― and a nationwide ban would nearly actually provoke a backlash.
That unpopularity is one purpose loads of pundits and outdoors observers maintain saying a nationwide ban is unlikely: In American politics, events hardly ever attempt to pursue adjustments that clear, massive majorities oppose. And after they do, they often fail and go on to endure penalties.
Simply ask the Republicans who tried to privatize Social Safety through the George W. Bush administration, or those who tried repealing the Inexpensive Care Act whereas Donald Trump was within the White Home.
Neither effort succeeded. Each instances, the cruel public response carried all the way in which to the next midterms, when those self same Republicans took a beating and misplaced management of Congress.
Nonetheless, loads has modified since then, and it could be a mistake to dismiss the opportunity of a nationwide abortion ban. The identical goes for different excessive concepts, like prohibitions on sure sorts of contraception or a rollback of same-sex marriage rights, that Republicans across the nation are actually endorsing overtly.
I can consider a number of causes to take these threats critically. Listed below are three:
Republicans have further layers of political insulation
The important thing obstacle to trying unpopular political crusades is the concern of political backlash. However at present’s Republicans have a number of layers of safety from such a backlash ― greater than at any time in latest historical past.
The apportionment of seats within the Senate (and, correspondingly, votes within the Electoral School) provides low-population states disproportionate energy. And the present geographic distribution of voters means these low-population states tilt Republican.
Final yr, progressive strategist David Shor calculated {that a} Democratic presidential candidate would want to win 52% of the favored vote simply to have a 50-50 shot at profitable the Electoral School.
That inbuilt partisan benefit within the Senate and Electoral School led on to the appointment of a number of conservative justices who would offer the bulk opinion to strike down Roe. (Bear in mind, among the many present conservative justices, solely Justice Clarence Thomas predates George W. Bush.)
That very same benefit would insulate Republicans from a political backlash to enacting a nationwide ban, perhaps sufficient to make it appear worthwhile.
GOP leaders can’t management their most excessive parts
That is maybe essentially the most profound change of latest years, and one which has change into particularly clear as we’ve discovered extra concerning the Jan. 6 revolt and the way Republicans reacted to it.
Instantly after the storming of the U.S. Capitol and the violent effort to overturn the 2020 election outcomes, Republican leaders stated they held Trump accountable, and that they had been ready to make him face the implications.
They stated so publicly and so they stated so privately. McConnell advised fellow Republicans that Trump deserved impeachment, and Home Minority Chief Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) advised colleagues he may ask Trump to resign, as Alexander Burns and Jonathan Martin of The New York Instances reported not too long ago.
However McConnell finally voted towards eradicating Trump from workplace, and it seems McCarthy by no means requested Trump to resign. As a substitute, they and different GOP leaders have spent the final yr and a half backpedaling, discovering new methods to downplay or excuse Trump’s function within the lethal riot ― whereas dodging confrontations with conspiracy-peddling Trump partisans like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).
Letting Trump and his most devoted supporters off the hook isn’t the identical as empowering extremists to set the legislative agenda, in fact. However there’s quite a lot of overlap between the Republican lawmakers decided to defend Trump and the Republican lawmakers decided to ban abortion.
And if GOP leaders are afraid to defy these extremist members on issues associated to the previous president, it’s not clear why they’d be extra prepared to defy them on issues associated to reproductive rights.
Abortion bans have a strong constituency
Whereas a strong majority of Individuals suppose abortion must be authorized most often, the minority who disagree are disproportionately white evangelicals ― who, in flip, would be the single most influential constituency inside the Republican Social gathering.
Just a few numbers inform the story.
White evangelicals signify a couple of quarter of the overall voters. And in 2020, one thing like 70% or 80% of them voted for Trump, relying on whose survey knowledge you belief. They have a tendency to vote in excessive numbers, even in off-year elections, and maintain further sway in states like Iowa and South Carolina that play an early, decisive function in choosing GOP presidential candidates.
As for his or her opinion on abortion itself, three-quarters of white evangelicals say it ought to largely or all the time be unlawful, in response to latest polling from Pew. And a mixed 86% say the assertion that “a fetus is an individual with rights” captures their perspective extraordinarily effectively, very effectively or considerably effectively.
Republican leaders have spent many years interesting to this constituency by promising to cease abortions. If the anticipated Supreme Courtroom ruling creates a possibility to do this nationally, GOP leaders can have a tough time explaining why they’re not benefiting from it.
