By Diane Bartz
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A U.S. decide on Friday dominated in favor of U.S. Sugar Corp’s plans to purchase rival Imperial Sugar Co, rejecting a Justice Division argument that the proposed deal would drive up the worth of sugar for households in addition to for meals and soda makers.
The Justice Division mentioned in a lawsuit filed final November that the $315 million deal would give U.S. Sugar, proprietor and member of a cooperative with three different firms, and American Sugar Refining, which sells below the Domino model, some 75% of refined sugar gross sales within the U.S. southeast.
U.S. Sugar mentioned in a press release that it was “happy” with the choice. The Justice Division didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark. It will possibly enchantment the loss.
Choose Maryellen Noreika of the U.S. District Court docket for Delaware issued the opinion below seal and mentioned a redacted model can be accessible.
The federal government, which known as U.S. Sugar “the world’s largest vertically-integrated cane sugar milling and refining operation,” argued that the deal would result in greater sugar costs within the southeastern United States, saying the 2 firms usually compete to win contracts from firms that make drinks, snacks and different ready meals.
The businesses argued that sugar was straightforward to move in order that limiting the market to the southeast was a mistake. Additionally they argued that Imperial is a high-priced competitor that purchases uncooked sugar to refine and doesn’t compete to decrease costs.
Additionally they argued that the U.S. Division of Agriculture screens sugar costs and might improve imports if wanted to deal with value will increase.